IP in Standardization

The Comparison and Commentaries on Version 2009 and 2004 of Regulations on National Standard Involving Patent (Interim)

The Comparison and Commentaries on Regulations on the Administration of Setting and Revision of the National Standard Involving Patent (Interim) (Exposure Draft) (2009 Nov.) and Regulations on National Standard Involving Patent  (Interim) (Exposure Draft) (2004 Sept.)

Zhong Yi [1]  Ni Jia  Liu Jiayin  [ Shanghai Runhe Law Firm ]

On Nov. 2, 2009, the Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China promulgated Regulations on the Administration of Setting and Revision of the National Standard Involving Patent (Interim) (Exposure Draft) (hereinafter "Version 2009") and asks for opinions from specified national organs, public institutions and industrial associations on revisions of which the deadline is Nov. 30, 2009. It is noticed that compared with Version 2009, Regulations on National Standard Involving Patent (Interim) (Exposure Draft) (hereinafter “Version 2004”) promulgated in September of 2004 is adjusted greatly on its contents.

Regulations on the Administration of Setting and Revision of the National Standard Involving Patent (Interim) (Exposure Draft) (2009-11-02)

Translated by: G·IPRs (Michael Ni, Katherine,  Shanghai Runhe Law Firm, Version: R1.0, Nov 19, 2009 )

Chapter I. General Provisions

Article 1 With the purpose of appropriately coping with the issues on national standards involving patent, standardizing the setting and revision of national standards, encouraging independent innovation, promoting the proper application of new technology in national standards, protecting the rights and interests of the public, patentees and relevant right owners, ensuring the effective implementation of national standards, Regulations on the Administration of Setting and Revision of the National Standard Involving Patent (hereinafter "Regulations") was hereby enacted in accordance with Standardization Law of the People's Republic of China, Patent Law of the People's Republic of China, Measures for Administration of National Standards and other relevant laws and regulations.

Focus on the Strategy of Patent Standardization ------ Specialized Legal Services in Audio Video Coding Industry

Author: Zhong Yi[1]   

[ Abstract ] DVD, CDMA, ATSC and other technical standards which contain patent technologies shocked us repeatedly with the power of patent standardization. In the light of the OutlineNational Intellectual Property Strategy, central and certain provincial governments successively carried out policies and measures to promote and encourage "Technology Patentability, Patent Standardization" and meanwhile TD-SCDMA, UOML, AVS and other industry alliances alike have fruitful achievements concerning the development of Patent Standardization. A burgeoning area of legal service emerges in the absence of corresponding legislation. This paper, with the perspective of establishing specialized legal services in the audio video coding industry, discusses how lawyers prepare for the ever-increasing requirements of legal services under the strategy of implementing and coping with Patent Standardization.

THE FIRST, THE WINNER —— COMMENTS ON THE PATENT STANDARDIZATION STRATEGY UNDER NEW PATENT LAW

Author: Zhong Yi, Shanghai Runhe Law Firm [ This article first published in the LexisNexis "China Legal Review" ]

Standardization, whether compulsory or recommendatory, is the general applicable threshold for the entry of market by certain products, while the patent, as a kind of legitimate monopoly, characterized as exclusiveness and utilization with payment. Therefore, if combined, “Patent Standardization” may be the “nuclear weapon” used by patent owner for the control of industrial chain, market monopoly and super-profit. DVD, CDMA, ATSC and other technical standards attaching patent rights show us the powers of Patent Standardization, which attracts various nations grabbing such scarce resources for the interests of its own nationals.

Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Certain Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Controversies over the Infringement of Patent Right (Draft) (2009-06-18)

Translated by: G·IPRs (Michael Ni, Katherine,  Shanghai Runhe Law Firm, Version: R1.0, June 29, 2009 )

For the purpose of correctly trying controversies over the infringement of patent right, this Interpretation is formulated in accordance with the Patent Law of the People’s Republic of China, Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China and other relevant legal provisions, and in combination with trial practices.

Syndicate content