Case Review
How to Deal with the Quality Dispute in the Software Development Contract
Submitted by Zhong Yi on Sun, 07/04/2010 - 22:22Author: Zhong Yi, Michael Ni [Shanghai Runhe Law Firm]
1. Brief Introduction to the First Instance
The plaintiff and the defendant entered into an contract providing that both parties collaboratively develop a set of software whose support of creation and art crafts, and manufacture and sales, etc. is provided by the plaintiff and the defendant shall be responsible for development and script plan of the programme; the copyright of the product belongs to the defendant; the price of the Contract was paid separately by procedure like down payment, test and etc.; after the product is on the market for 30 days and if no quality issues which arouse return of goods, the rest payment will be made by the defendant, or the payment will be offset for the losses of goods; the copyright will be transferred to the plaintiff if the defendant is late for make payment. After the plaintiff delivered the developed software to the defendant, the defendant made it published by publisher for sale in the market under the condition that the software hasn't been accepted in a formal way. During the procedure of sales, the plaintiff provided supplemental "Q&A of Installation" and "Software Patches" which are sold together with the software by the request of the defendant. After that, the defendant refused to make the rest payment on the grounds that the software has quality issue for which the plaintiff filed the case to the court requesting the defendant to pay the rest payment for developing the software.
- Zhong Yi's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- 中文
Determination of the Amount of Damages of Software Copyright Infringement
Submitted by Katherine on Fri, 05/21/2010 - 10:42Author: Zhong Yi, Liu Jiayin [Shanghai Runhe Law Firm]
In the trial of the case of software copyright infringement, how to determine the amount of damages in the event that the software involved in the case has been taken off the market? Will it affect the determination of the infringement and the amount of compensation if the infringer purchases the upgrade version of the software involved in the case after the litigation procedure begins? The following restatement of the Case will discuss such issues.
- Katherine's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- 中文
Offering for Sale in the Design Infringement
Submitted by Katherine on Sat, 06/06/2009 - 20:41Author: Zhong Yi, Liu Jiayin [Shanghai Runhe Law Firm]
1. Case Introduction
Court: Intermediate People's Court of One City
Plaintiff: Company A (Patentee)
Defendant: Company B (Infringer)
- Katherine's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- 中文
Elementary Comments On the Legal Protection of Software File Format
Submitted by Zhong Yi on Sun, 05/31/2009 - 12:24Author: Zhong Yi, Ni Jia [Shanghai Runhe Law Firm]
1. Brief Introduction to the Case
Court of First Instance: Intermediate People's Court of One City
Court of Second Instance: High People's Court of One City
Plaintiff of the First Instance (the Appellee of the Second Instance): Company A (the Copyright Owner of JDP Software)
Defendant of the First Instance (the Appellor of the Second Instance): Company B
- Zhong Yi's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- 中文
Recessive Reverse Passing Off in Trademark Infringements
Submitted by Zhong Yi on Thu, 05/07/2009 - 11:04Author: Zhong Yi, Katherine Liu [ Shanghai Runhe Law Firm ]
1. Case Summary
Court: Intermediate People's Court of One City; Plaintiff: Company A (Proprietor of Trademark Y); Defendant: Company B (Infringer)
Plaintiff alleged: Defendant, Company B, purchased several old mechines of Trademark Y manufactured by Plaintiff, repaired them and sold them without attaching any mark after removing the brands, which impeded the popularity of Plaintiff's trademark from being enlarged, impacted its market shares and infringed its exclusive right of use to Trademark Y. Plaintiff pleaded the Court to adjudicate that Defendant should immediately cease its infringing acts upon Plaintiff's trademark and compensate Plaintiff relevant losses, lawyer fees, expenses for the collection of evidences, case acceptance fee and other litigation costs.
- Zhong Yi's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- 中文
Dispute Over Stock Rights On Chinese-Foreign Joint Ventures
Submitted by Zhong Yi on Fri, 06/20/2008 - 14:30Authored by: Zhong Yi, Attorney at Law - Shanghai Runhe Law Firm; Editor by:Corinna Qian [2007]
Translated by Michael
Case Background
First-instance court: the Higher People’s Court of Shanghai Municipality
Appeal court: the PRC Supreme People’s Court
Appellant (Defendant in the first instance): Company A
Appellee (Plaintiff in the first instance): Company B
- Zhong Yi's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- 中文
The Retrial for the International Air Freight Dispute
Submitted by Zhong Yi on Fri, 06/20/2008 - 12:24Authored by: Zhong Yi, Attorney at Law - Shanghai Runhe Law Firm; Editor by:Corinna Qian, Liu Fei [2007]
Case Background:
The courts:
The first instance court: The Intermediate People's Court of Huzhou City.
The second instance court: The High People's Court of Zhejiang Province.
The retrial court: The Supreme People’s Court.
- Zhong Yi's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- 中文

